The Palestinian Question 

Szerző: | szept 28, 2025 | Ázsia, Elemzés, Foreign Relations, Háború

Written by Kevin Herbert

The State of Palestine was officially declared by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) on  15 November 1988, claiming sovereignty over the internationally recognized Palestinian  territories: the West Bank (which includes East Jerusalem) and the Gaza Strip. By the end of 1988,  the Palestinian state was recognized by 78 countries. Many countries support a two-state solution  to the conflict. Fourteen of the nineteen member countries the G20 (Argentina, Australia, Brazil,  Canada, China, France, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkey and  the United Kingdom), plus permanent invitee Spain, have recognized Palestine as a state; the other  five (Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea and the United States) do not recognize Palestine. As of  September 2025, the State of Palestine is recognized as a sovereign state by 157 of the 193 member  states of the United Nations (UN), or approximately 81% of all UN members. The biggest question  is how the latest recognitions will affect US and Israel who have constantly opposed it for a long  time, but the most trusted allies have moved away from their interests.

History

The roots of Palestinian national identity can be traced back to the late 19th and early 20th centuries,  amid the decline of the Ottoman Empire. As nationalism swept across Europe, various ethnic groups began to assert their identities and seek self-determination. In this context, Palestinians  started to cultivate a unique national identity, influenced by various socio-political dynamics,  including the rise of Arab nationalism and the impact of colonialism, particularly during and after  World War I. The Balfour Declaration of 1917, which expressed British support for the  establishment of a “national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine, marked a pivotal turning  point. This declaration not only ignited the aspirations of Jewish immigrants but also galvanized  Palestinian resistance and the formation of a distinct national consciousness among its people. The  1920s and 1930s saw the emergence of Palestinian political organizations, which sought to address  the growing concerns over land and sovereignty amidst increasing Jewish migration. In the  aftermath of World War II, the United Nations proposed the Partition Plan of 1947, which sought  to create separate Jewish and Arab states in Palestine. This plan was accepted by the Jewish  leadership but rejected by Arab leaders, leading to the 1948 Arab Israeli War and the subsequent  establishment of the State of Israel. The war resulted in the displacement of hundreds of thousands  of Palestinians, an event known as the Nakba, or “catastrophe.” This mass exodus further solidified  Palestinian identity, as they began to articulate their historical narrative of loss and dispossession.  Through the rising tide of Palestinian activism, both domestically and internationally, various  movements began to advocate for rights and statehood. The 1993 Oslo Accords, which established  a framework for peace negotiations between the PLO and Israel, brought a renewed focus to the  quest for recognition and statehood. However, the subsequent breakdown of the peace process and  ongoing conflicts have complicated efforts toward achieving tangible recognition. In mid-2025  support for Palestinian statehood gained momentum ahead of the annual gathering of the United  Nations General Assembly in September, when world leaders gather and often use the platform to  make diplomatic appeals to a broad international audience. Nevertheless, such recognition would  be, to some extent, symbolic. Although the Palestinian Authority asserts some level of self governance and international relations, the traditional criteria for a modern state—namely a  defined territory over which a government has a monopoly on the use of force—would require  Israel to relinquish its military authority over the areas of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip that  the PA claims for a Palestinian state. Israeli officials, citing security needs and with support from  the United States, have been reluctant to do so, especially in the wake of the October 7 attack and  the ensuing Israel-Hamas War.

Situation Overview & Humanitarian Needs over the years

The Palestinians view the aid as keeping the Israeli Palestinian peace process going, while Israelis  and other foreign policy authorities have raised concerns that it is used to fund terrorism and  removes the imperative for Palestinians to negotiate a settlement of the Israeli Palestinian conflict. Between 1993 and 1997 the PA faced serious economic and financial problems. International aid  prevented the collapse of the local economy and contributed to the establishment of the Palestinian  administration. Donors’ pledges continued to increase regularly (their value had risen to  approximately $3,420 million as of the end of October 1997) because of the faltering peace process, along with the increase in needs and the consequent increase in the assistance necessary for Palestinians to survive. Reality led, however, to a revision of the donors’ priorities Out of concern  that the deteriorating economic conditions could result in a derailment of the peace process, donor  support was redirected to finance continued budgetary shortfalls, housing programs and  emergency employment creation. The 2nd Intifada crisis caused the erosion of the development  effort financed by the international community, since the overwhelming emphasis in donor work  was now directed towards mitigating the impact of the economic and social crisis. A collapse of  the PNA was averted by emergency budget support from donor countries. Despite a significant  increase in donor commitments in 2002 compared with 2001, commitments to infrastructure and  capacity-building work with a medium-term focus continued to decline. In 2000, the ratio was  approximately 7:1 in favor of development assistance. By 2002, the ratio had shifted to almost 5:1  in favor of emergency assistance. On 25 January 2006, the Islamist organization, Hamas, which is  considered by the main donor countries to be a terrorist organization, won the Palestinian  legislative elections and formed government on 29 March 2006, without accepting the terms and  conditions set by the Quartet. This resulted in the imposition of economic sanctions against the  PA, including near cessation of direct relations and aid between most bilateral donors and the PA,  with only some multilateral agencies and a few donors continuing direct contact and project  administration. The Quartet’s decision was criticized by the Quartet’s former envoy, James  Wolfensohn, who characterized it as a misguided attempt to starve the Hamas-led Palestinians into  submission. In December 2007, during the Paris Conference, which followed the Annapolis  Conference, donor countries pledged over $7.7 billion for 2008–2010 in support of the Palestinian  Reform and Development Program (PRDP). Hamas, which was not invited to Paris, called the  conference a „declaration of war” on it. In the beginning of 2008, the World Bank also launched a  trust fund that would provide support in the context of the PA’s 2008–2010 reform policy agenda.  In March 2011, there were threats to cut off aid to the PA if it continued to move forward on a  unity government with Hamas, unless Hamas formally renounced violence, recognized Israel, and  accepted previous Israel-Palestinian agreements. On 23 March 2018, U.S. President Donald Trump  signed the Taylor Force Act into law, which will cut about a third of US foreign aid payments to  the PA, until the PA ceases making payment of stipends to terrorists and their surviving families.

In July 2018, Australia stopped the A$10M (US$7.5M) in funding that had been sent to the PA  via the World Bank and instead is sending it to the UN Humanitarian Fund for the Palestinian  Territories. The reason given was that they did not want the PA to use the funds to assist  Palestinians convicted of politically motivated violence.

On 24 August, the United States cut more than $200 million in direct aid to the PA. The  administration had previously cut aid to several UN bodies devoted to the Palestinian cause,  including cutting $300 million off the contribution to United Nations Relief and Works Agency  (UNRWA), and the UN Human Rights Council.

Latest developments in Palestine

The UNRWA commissioner-general has echoed a message from the International Rescue  Committee earlier about the rising number of child amputees in Gaza.

“The toll on children & childhood is beyond just the physical injury & the spreading hunger.  Children’s scars are deep & invisible: anxiety, nightmares, aggression + fear. Many are being  forced into begging, looting or child labor: a lost childhood,” Philippe Lazzarini said.

“The longer this goes on the more the children will be haunted by their ongoing + deepening  traumas for generations to come.”

The armed wing of Hamas says its fighters launched mortar rounds and short-range Rajum rockets  at invading Israeli ground forces.

The Qassam Brigades said in a short statement that Israeli soldiers gathered in an area east of  besieged Gaza City.

The armed group also released a video showing an Israeli Merkava tank being directly hit by a  rocket-propelled grenade. The location of that attack was given as the Tal al-Hawa area of southern  Gaza City

At least 64 Palestinians have been killed by Israel since dawn with 42 of them dying in besieged  Gaza City, medical sources tell Al Jazeera.

As of Wednesday afternoon, al-Shifa Hospital and al-Ahli Hospital in Gaza City reported 17 and  25 deaths, respectively.

Nasser Hospital in southern Gaza said Israel’s army killed another 16 people.

The latest killings come a day after UN chief Guterres said the “scale of death and destruction” in  Israel’s war on Gaza was beyond any other conflict he has seen during his tenure.

The Meeting between Trump, Erdogan and Arab leaders

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan described Tuesday’s talks between Donald Trump and  Arab and Muslim leaders on ending Israel’s war on Gaza as „very fruitful”. The meeting took place  on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York between the US president and leaders  and diplomats from Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE, Egypt, Jordan, Pakistan and Indonesia.

Reporting ahead of the event suggested that Trump would present a peace proposal to end the war  and a roadmap for Gaza’s future governance. In comments to reporters, Erdogan said that a joint  declaration will be published and that he was „pleased” with the outcome, without elaborating. The discussions focused on brokering a ceasefire, releasing the captives and alleviating the  humanitarian catastrophe, Emirati state media reported. The principles laid out in the Trump peace  plan reportedly include an Israeli military withdrawal from Gaza, the release of all captives and a  post-war administration involving the Palestinian Authority. It also calls for Arab and Muslim countries to contribute troops to an international peacekeeping force that would replace Israeli  forces in the shattered territory. The US president is expected to meet with Israeli Prime Minister  Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House on 29 September.

Conclusion

With 157 member states now recognizing Palestine, the momentum for Palestinian statehood has  increased, even among staunch US allies. Seamless recognition, although symbolic, places  pressure on Israel and the US, which continue to oppose statehood. The decades-long conflict,  coupled with the overreliance on aid, and fractured diplomacy—especially the rift between Hamas  and the PA—has stymied the numerous attempts for peace. The humanitarian situation in Gaza is  alarming, with a soaring death toll among civilians and hidden wounds on the faces of the children.  The latest summit hosted by Trump with the Arab and Muslim world proposes a ceasefire, the  freeing of hostages, and international peace guardians in Gaza the world order is changing, and  with it, the still tenuous prospects for Palestinian independence are now receiving greater attention.

References

International recognition of Palestine – Wikipedia

Recognition of Palestine: a long history

The History of Recognition of Palestine as a State: The Path to Statehood – World History

Palestinian statehood | Recognition, History, Sovereignty, Israel, Diplomatic Relations, & Map |  Britannica

UNICEF State of Palestine Humanitarian Situation Report for End-of-Year 2023 – occupied  Palestinian territory | ReliefWeb

International aid to Palestinians – Wikipedia

LIVE: Israel kills more than 60 Palestinians in war-devastated Gaza | Israel-Palestine conflict  News | Al Jazeera

Trump’s Gaza talks with Arab-Muslim leaders ‘fruitful’: Erdogan